Lauren O’Neill-Butler is a senior editor of Artforum.Peruvian police said Ruth Thalia Sayas Sanchez was poisoned and strangled to death after appearing on the reality show "The Value of Truth." In different ways, the people she profiles bring the light. On the flip side, she always searched for some kernel of cautious optimism, as she does throughout Men in Dark Times. She goes on: “Darkness has come when this light is extinguished by ‘credibility gaps’ and ‘invisible government,’ by speech that does not disclose what is but sweeps it under the carpet, by exhortations, moral and otherwise, that, under the pretext of upholding old truths, degrade all truth to meaningless triviality.” Arendt’s attention to lying, nonsense, and deception-i.e., alternative facts-as instrumental forms of political violence isn’t just clairvoyant. The triumph of mendacity is the “catastrophe” she mulls over in the introduction: the tragedy she first witnessed during World War II, brought on by “the highly efficient talk and double-talk of nearly all official representatives who, without interruption and in many ingenious variations, explained away unpleasant facts and concerns.” A clairvoyant description of Trump’s obliteration of politics and ongoing denials when it comes to the rule of law? Maybe not the “ingenious” part.
She witnessed this during the ruinous ’68 elections and the demise of the Democratic Party. But in Men in Dark Times she pointed to something subtler, harder to see, and foundationally carcinogenic: when lies overwhelm the truth. Her recurrent discussion of how historical records and rational truths can be manipulated by a community or administration into matters of mere opinion (through “organized lying”) speaks loud and clear to the rewriting of history, redacting of public information, and rejection of science and data we see nearly everywhere today.Īrendt’s focus was deeply informed by the Holocaust and other “monstrosities,” as she put it, of the first half of the twentieth century, which she had analyzed in depth in much of her work.
What really hits home is Men in Dark Times’s staggering preface, which builds on her 1967 essay “Truth and Politics,” and predicts our post-truth moment. The collected articles on, well, mostly men-Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Jaspers, Walter Benjamin, and Bertolt Brecht, among others-are less theoretically dense than those in the Origins, yet no less powerful. So while it was uplifting, in the wake of the past US presidential election, to catch flashes of The Origins of Totalitarianism on the subway and social media, I kept wondering whether this subsequent book might’ve been a better Arendt go-to. Her work of this era has serious blind spots when it comes to race, gender, and class, but I tend to think her most influential ideas-on being a pariah, on revolution, on statelessness-are presented with increased clarity, wit, and verve in Men in Dark Times. Strands of her thought from previous decades were coming together, sometimes uneasily. She published a collection of essays, Men in Dark Times she began drafting a version of what became her controversial 1969 essay “On Violence” and she was sketching her final book, The Life of the Mind. IN 1968, HANNAH ARENDT had just begun teaching at the New School for Social Research in New York and was watching local anti–Vietnam War protests with abundant optimism.
0 kommentar(er)
